The updated article and code available at
https://bitbucket.org/camlspotter/compiler-libs-hack
A safe but strange way of modifying OCaml compiler
OCaml 4.00.0 is out! Have you tried it? GADT? Better first class modules? More warnings?
I am talking something different, something more exciting at least for me. Compiler-libs.
Compiler-libs are modules of the compiler itself, and now available for everyone as a library, even for binary package users. This means that we can deliver compilish hacks much easier to everyone. If the hack is reasonably small we can publish them not as a compiler patch which requires boring source download + patching + entire recompilation of the compiler, but as a stand alone tool which compiles in really shorter time. Here, I am going to demonstrate such a small compiler hack, SML style overloading, my favorite compiler mod.
Safe compiler mod ever
What is great about 4.00.0 is it also have an untyper and an AST printer. They are not in the part of the compiler-libs, but found in tools dir. (So for binary package users we must copy them but they are very small, and I hope they are soon in compiler-libs in 4.00.1 or 4.01.0.)
The untyper takes a type-checked source tree (Typedtree), strips away its attached type information, then returns the corresponding untyped tree (Parsetree). The AST printer prints out a Parsetree as a reparseable OCaml source code.
Using them we can create safe compiler mods: our modified compiler can do whatever it wants, then it makes the result back to Parsetree and refeeds it to the original typechecker and compiler. If the mod does something wrong, the original compiler part should find it. If a user is paranoiac about what our mod does, we can always print out the result as vanilla OCaml code. Cool.
Preparation
All the code is available here:
hg clone https://bitbucket.org/camlspotter/compiler-libs-hack
It contains the full source tree of the official OCaml 4.00.0, but it is attached only for the copyright requirements. We only need few files of it. And of course, you must have OCaml 4.00.0 installed.
Vanilla compiler
First of all, lets start cloning a vanilla compiler from compiler-libs. It is very easy:
$ cd vanilla
$ make
cp ../ocaml/driver/main.ml main.ml
ocamlc -I +compiler-libs -I +unix -c main.ml
ocamlc -o vanilla -I +compiler-libs ocamlcommon.cma ocamlbytecomp.cma main.cmo
cp ../ocaml/driver/optmain.ml optmain.ml
ocamlc -I +compiler-libs -I +unix -c optmain.ml
ocamlc -o vanillaopt -I +compiler-libs ocamlcommon.cma ocamloptcomp.cma optmain.cmo
To build a vanilla ocamlc, we need the original
main.ml and link it with
ocamlcommon.cma and
ocamlbytecomp.cma.
main.ml must be copied from the original source tree, since it is not included in the compiler-libs.
For the native code compiler, instead of
main.ml and
ocamlbytecomp.cma, we use
optmain.ml and
ocamloptcompo.cma.
Now you have two executables
vanilla and
vanillaopt, which are actually clones of
ocamlc and
ocamlopt. Try using them to compile some simple modules to see they are really working.
Now you know how to use compiler-libs. Let's do something more interesting.
Compiler with untype+retyping
The next thing is to use the untyper and the AST printer. Here we modify the bytecode compiler workflow a bit, so that once the original compiler type-check the source code, we untype it, then print it as readable OCaml source, then retype it again. The workflow is implemented in
ocaml/driver/compile.ml:
Pparse.file ppf inputfile Parse.implementation ast_impl_magic_number
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_parsetree Printast.implementation
++ Typemod.type_implementation sourcefile outputprefix modulename env
++ Translmod.transl_implementation modulename
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_rawlambda Printlambda.lambda
++ Simplif.simplify_lambda
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_lambda Printlambda.lambda
++ Bytegen.compile_implementation modulename
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_instr Printinstr.instrlist
++ Emitcode.to_file oc modulename;
Simple. The source file is first parsed by
Pparse.file, then the result is sent to the next line of the parsetree dumper, then sent to the type checker, and so on... The source is pipelined from the top line to the bottom.
We here insert few extra steps into this pipeline to untype and print:
Pparse.file ppf inputfile Parse.implementation ast_impl_magic_number
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_parsetree Printast.implementation
++ Typemod.type_implementation sourcefile outputprefix modulename env
++ (fun (str, _) -> (* Inserting an additional step! *)
let ptree = Untypeast.untype_structure str in
Format.eprintf "%a@." Pprintast.structure ptree;
ptree
)
++ Translmod.transl_implementation modulename
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_rawlambda Printlambda.lambda
++ Simplif.simplify_lambda
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_lambda Printlambda.lambda
++ Bytegen.compile_implementation modulename
++ print_if ppf Clflags.dump_instr Printinstr.instrlist
++ Emitcode.to_file oc modulename;
Typed structure
str from
Typemod.type_implementation is untyped back to
ptree by
Untypeast.untype_structure, then it is printed out by
Pprintast.structure. The untyped tree is sent again to the type checker and the later steps.
Does it really work? Yes!:
$ cd retype
$ make
It creates a bytecode compiler
retype. It just works as
ocamlc, but it also prints out the source code. Try it to compile some files.
Compiler mod!
Now you should get the idea of compiler modification with compiler-libs: your compiler mod somehow creates an untyped AST, then feed it to the original typechecker and the following compiler pipeline. The original type-checker assures the safety of the output of your mod. The output can be printed as a normal OCaml code by the AST printer, too.
By this, you can even have your own parser and you own type-checker in order to implement a completely diffrent language which uses OCaml as a backend! (Besides, beware of the license terms if you want to distribute your hack!)
But for this time, I would like to demonstrate something much simpler: using the original parser and type-checker, then modify that typedtree: adding another pipeline step after the first type checking of the
retype compiler:
(* See overload/compile.ml *)
...
++ Typemod.type_implementation sourcefile outputprefix modulename env
++ (fun (str, _) -> Mod.structure str) (* We modify the tree! *)
++ (fun str ->
let ptree = Untypeast.untype_structure str in
Format.eprintf "%a@." Pprintast.structure ptree;
ptree)
++ Typemod.type_implementation sourcefile outputprefix modulename env
++ ...
Mod.structure : Typedtree.structure -> Typedtree.structure does something fancy, in this article, SML styple overloading resolution!
SML style overloading
SML style overloading is very simple way to overload things. Much simpler than Haskell type classes, so you cannot derive overloading from overloaded values. You can get the idea from my past article *http://camlspotter.blogspot.sg/2011/09/small-patch-for-bizarre-but-user.html*. Let's try to overload
(+) here too.
The design of the mod of this time is as follows. We need a seed of an overloaded value, with a polymorphic type, but without any actual definition. Fortunately, we have a way for this in OCaml: primitive declaration:
module Loaded = struct
external (+) : 'a -> 'a -> 'a = "OVERLOADDED"
end
Here we declare
Loaded.(+) to be a polymorphic function whose implementation is by C function named
OVERLODED. But we do not give any C code. The name
OVERLOADED is just a mark for our overloading. Very luckily, we can have such a fake polymorphic value in OCaml as far as such a value is never actually used.
In this
Loaded module, we stack sub-modules which provide overloaded instances for this
(+):
module Loaded = struct
external (+) : 'a -> 'a -> 'a = "OVERLOADDED"
module Int = struct
let (+) = Pervasives.(+)
end
module Float = struct
let (+) = Pervasives.(+.)
end
endHere we have pluses for
int and
float. Now the preparation is done! Let's use
Loaded.(+) as if it is overloaded by these two instances!:
open Loaded
let _ =
assert (1 + 2 = 3);
assert (1.2 + 3.4 = 4.6) (* See it is not +. but + !!! *)
Hey, I used
Loaded.(+), which is actually a C primitive without C code! Is it ok? It is NOT, without our compiler mod. The mod must replace the use of
Loaded.(+) by
Loaded.Int.(+) or
Loaded.Float.(+) appropriately depending on its type from the context: the first
+ is
int -> int -> int and the second is
float -> float -> float:
(* See overload/mod.ml *)
let resolve_overloading e lidloc path = ...
class map = object (self)
inherit Ttmap.map as super
method! expression = function
| ({ exp_desc= Texp_ident (path, lidloc, vdesc) } as e)->
begin match vdesc.val_kind with
| Val_prim { Primitive.prim_name = "OVERLOADED" } ->
self, resolve_overloading e lidloc path
| _ -> super#expression e
end
| e -> super#expression e
end
let structure str =
let o = new map in
let _, str = o#structure str in
strHere is (some part of) the code of the mod. It is a function of
Typedtree.structure -> Typedtree.structure, but we are only interested in the uses of identifiers whose definitions are by primitives
OVERLOADED. So the boilerplate code to dig into the AST data types I used a generic map class
Ttmap created by a CamlP4 hack. For each identifier whose definition is
OVERLOADED is converted by the function
resolve_overloading function.
The actual overload resolution is quite simple, if you know the internals of OCaml type-checker. But if you don't, it is just too painful to read. So it is skipped :^) (see
mod.ml if you are really interested). The big picture is: traverse the module which defines the primitive to find the values with the same name, then filter out those which do not match the context type. If there is none left, error. If there are more than one matches, error. If there is only one candidate, replace the primitive use by the candidate variable.
Anyway, building and playing this mod is very easy:
$ cd overlaod
$ make
It creates a bytecode compiler
poorman. Well, compared to the full overloading by type classes, this is very simple, a poorman's overloading solution. We have a test code at
test/test.ml so you can try compiling it by
poorman:
$ ./poorman -o test/test test/test.ml
$ ./test/test # Well, it just tests some assertions
Do you see how the overloaded instances are declared in
test/test.ml? They are separately defined in modules and then gathered under
Loaded with the
OVERLOADED primitive by module aliases. Actually it is very powerful mechanism to tailor overloading!
That's all, folks!
This kind of compiler modifications are of course possible even in the previous versions of OCaml compilers, but their distributions had to be as patches against the original compilers, and the users need to recompile the whole compiler sets, which took about 10 minutes. But now, with compiler-libs, it is less than one minute. Compiler-libs are not just for strange compiler mods, but also good for compiler related tool development. It is really encouraging for us, OCaml mutators, since we can deliver our compiler prototypes very easily to end users!
